Thursday, July 15, 2010

SANTA ANA JUDGE (MAGICIAN CLOWNS) FUMBLING THE NUCLEAR ARSENALS









Another Inept Decision by Wendy S. LindleyJames R. Pinck a Murderer Threat





ANTI-CHRIST U S DECISIONPhotobucket




THE ABOVE AND ENTITLED EXHIBIT(S) OF OUR CREATOR IS A LEGAL ACT OF TREACHERY. THE PARTY(S) TO THIS EMPHASIS ARE NUCLEAR AND FIREPROOF MAGICIAN CO-911 CRIMEE FELONS THAT EMPHASIZE AN ANIMAL AND ALIEN UNIVERSAL LIKE-S ONENESS ENERGY REGRESSION MISTAKE TO REGRESS HUMAN EVOLVEMENT FURTHER AT A TEST.

THESE SANTA ANA UNITS SODOMIZED CHILDREN AND KILLED(GRUESOMELY THROUGHOUT REGRESSIVE CAPACITY), VICTIM PETITIONED THE ACCUSED AN COMPROMISE PERSONIFICATION OF DE-FACTO MERGENCE IF POSSIBLE DO TO THE SITUATION(S) WE SEE??

THE ACCUSED ARE DANGEROUS DEVIL-LIKE SAY CAPITAL CRIMINAL WILD BEAST ANIMALS AT EMPHASIZE VOID OF RATIONAL THOUGHT UNDER COLOR PHONY EMBLEMS AND PROTECTIVE IRONYS TODAY.

PROCEEDING FROM A PRETENCE OF ENDOWMENT BY OUR CREATOR'S TESTAMENTARY THE SAY ACCUSED DOTH DO RECALL A PSYCHIATRIC INFORMATION PREDICATION TO THE EMPHASIS OF DEFEATING TECHNICAL MEANS OF VERIFICATION OH WELL WMD DISARMAMENT AND EVER SO SWEARINGLY NOT- OPEN DOORS IN NUCLEAR PLEASURES AND BEAST ALIEN REGRESSION I DO.

CLAIMANT(S) RISKING LIFE LIMB EVALUATION A SWEARER NOT A FOR A LIBERTY TO UPHOLD A HIGHER MASS A STRONGER FLAG CONTRARY TO A CLOAK DEBIT ACCESSING A FINITE BEAST 6 MENTAL BLOCK UNDERSTANDING OF ALL A LOFTY HUMAN WOULD ASPIRE TO UPHOLD?
AND THIS IS IMPLACABLE I SAY?








Steven Van Arroyo
1. Steven VAN ARROYO 15432 Jackson St # 302
Alias STEVEN VAN SCHOFER too as a Midway City CA. 92655


Plaintiff

Vs.

THE PEOPLE OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AS FOLLOWS: GEORGE HERBERT WALKER BUSH and GEORGE WALKER BUSH, in their official and individual capacity, BARACK H. OBAMA in his official and individual capacity’s, JOHN ASHCROFT in his official and individual capacity, MARGARET SPELLINGS, in her official and individual capacity, SAM BODMAN, in his official and individual capacity, MIKE LEAVITT, in his official and individual capacity, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, in his official and individual capacity,, AL GONZALES, in his official and individual capacity, ALPHONSO JACKSON in his official and individual capacity, DON RUMSFELD in his official and individual capacity,


ROBERT GATES in his official and individual capacity, CONDOLEEZA RICE in her official and individual capacity, HENRY PAULSON, in his official and individual capacity, STEPHEN JOHNSON, in his official and individual capacity,

JOHN WALTERS, in his official and individual capacity, BARACK OBAMA in his official and individual capacity, HILARY CLINTON in her official and individual capacity, MICHAEL MULLENS in his official and individual capacity, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON in his individual and official capacity, JOHN MOORELACH in his official and individual capacity,, RON LOWENBERG, in his official and individual capacity, MIKE CAPPIZI, in his official and individual capacity, ANTHONY RACKAKAUS in his official and individual capacity, MICHAEL STEVEN CARONA, in his official and individual capacity,


ARNOLD SCHWARTZNEGGAR in his official and individual capacity WENDY S. LINDLEY in her official and individual capacity, DIANNE FEINSTEIN in her official and individual capacity, BARBARA BOXER, in her official and individual capacity’s, DANA ROHRABACHER in his official and individual capacity, LORETTA SANCHEZ in her official and individual capacity:

ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS in its official capacity, THE ORANGE COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICES, in its official capacity, SUPERIOR COURT SANTA ANA, in its official and collective capacity, MUNICIPLE COURT WESTMINISTER, in all its official capacity, THE SUPREME COURTS THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, in all its official capacity, THE FEDERAL SUPREME COURT WASHINGTON D C, in all its capacity, THE INTERNATIONAL WORLD COURT OF JUSTICE BELGIUM, in all its official capacity

ALL STIPULATED DEFENDANTS TO MATERIAL SEQUESTER OF FACTS AND FICTICIOUS INSIGNIAS TO THE EMBLEM FOR WHICH I SEEK PUNITIVE DAMAGES HERETELL?


3. FIRST AMENDED CIVIL RICO CLAIM TRIAL BY SECURITY ACTIONS DEMANDED
COUNTS FOR EACH DEFENDANT, FOR EACH PREDICATE ACT,
DECIDED BY THE JURY:




TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 79 > § 1621
Prev Next
§ 1621. Perjury generally
How current is this?
Whoever—
(1) having taken an oath before a competent tribunal, officer, or person, in any case in which a law of the United States authorizes an oath to be administered, that he will testify, declare, depose, or certify truly, or that any written testimony, declaration, deposition, or certificate by him subscribed, is true, willfully and contrary to such oath states or subscribes any material matter which he does not believe to be true; or

(2) in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code, willfully subscribes as true any material matter which he does not believe to be true; is guilty of perjury and shall, except as otherwise expressly provided by law, be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both. This section is applicable whether the statement or subscription is made within or without the United States.

PARTICULAR PERSONAGES SAID TO BE ACTING OUT UNLAWFUL MEANS IN A COURT OF LEGAL PRECIDENCE?

Wendy S. Lindley in her official and individual capacity(s), Orange County Probation Department, James R. Pinck in his, (ours),official and individual capacity, Alice Jones, in her official and individual capacity(s), Eden Martelly, in her official and individual capacity(s) , Orange County Sheriff Department, each individual to this sequester Affidavit of involvement, Sandra Hutchens in her official and individual capacity(s) Orange County Board of Supervisors, John Moorlach, in his official and individual capacity, Collaborative Partners Esq., County of Orange Santa Ana and Wit Court Esq. in his official and individual capacity.

These individuals severed the United States Federal Code of Justice and the emphasis of the foregoing U. S. Title(s) and to the flagrance of contemptuous mockeries, exercise no iota of recourse. In furtherance do understand these material facts concerning ill-begotten energy exchange-metamorphosis, understood as magic force(s of said to be Nature, that directly affected, to the extents of do cause casualties and death daily and do situate a have gun at court rancor in an effort to continue a treachery swindle the Health, Welfare(s), and Public Safety, of all who come to aid an abetment in these Criminal and Heinous acts against the Republic for which I stand?


TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 79 > § 1622
Prev Next
§ 1622. Subornation of perjury
How current is this?
Whoever procures another to commit any perjury is guilty of subornation of perjury, and shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

Wendy S. Lindley in her official and individual capacity(s), Orange County Probation Department, James R. Pinck in his, (ours),official and individual capacity, Alice Jones, in her official and individual capacity(s), Eden Martelly, in her official and individual capacity(s) , Orange County Sheriff Department, each individual to this sequester Affidavit of involvement, Sandra Hutchens in her official and individual capacity(s) Orange County Board of Supervisors, John Moorlach, in his official and individual capacity, Collaborative Partners Esq., County of Orange Santa Ana and Wit Court Esq. in his official and individual capacity.

These individuals severed the United States Federal Code of Justice and to the emphasis of the foregoing U. S. Title(s) and to the flagrance of contemptuous mockeries, exercise no iota of recourse. In furtherance do understand these material facts concerning ill-begotten energy exchange-metamorphosis, understood as magic force(s of said to be Nature, that directly affected, to the extents of do cause casualties and death daily and do situate a have gun at court rancor in an effort to continue a treachery swindle the Health, Welfare(s), and Public Safety, of all who come to aid an abetment in these Criminal and Heinous acts against the Republic for which I stand?



TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 79 > § 1623
Prev Next
§ 1623. False declarations before grand jury or court
How current is this?

(a) Whoever under oath (or in any declaration, certificate, verification, or statement under penalty of perjury as permitted under section 1746 of title 28, United States Code) in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States knowingly makes any false material declaration or makes or uses any other information, including any book, paper, document, record, recording, or other material, knowing the same to contain any false material declaration, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

(b) This section is applicable whether the conduct occurred within or without the United States.

(c) An indictment or information for violation of this section alleging that, in any proceedings before or ancillary to any court or grand jury of the United States, the defendant under oath has knowingly made two or more declarations, which are inconsistent to the degree that one of them is necessarily false, need not specify which declaration is false if—

(1) each declaration was material to the point in question, and

(2) each declaration was made within the period of the statute of limitations for the offense charged under this section.
In any prosecution under this section, the falsity of a declaration set forth in the indictment or information shall be established sufficient for conviction by proof that the defendant while under oath made irreconcilably contradictory declarations material to the point in question in any proceeding before or ancillary to any court or grand jury. It shall be a defense to an indictment or information made pursuant to the first sentence of this subsection that the defendant at the time he made each declaration believed the declaration was true.

(d) Where, in the same continuous court or grand jury proceeding in which a declaration is made, the person making the declaration admits such declaration to be false, such admission shall bar prosecution under this section if, at the time the admission is made, the declaration has not substantially affected the proceeding, or it has not become manifest that such falsity has been or will be exposed.

(e) Proof beyond a reasonable doubt under this section is sufficient for conviction. It shall not be necessary that such proof be made by any particular number of witnesses or by documentary or other type of evidence.

Wendy S. Lindley in her official and individual capacity(s), Orange County Probation Department, James R. Pinck in his, (ours),official and individual capacity, Alice Jones, in her official and individual capacity(s), Eden Martelly, in her official and individual capacity(s) , Orange County Sheriff Department, each individual to this sequester Affidavit of involvement, Sandra Hutchens in her official and individual capacity(s) Orange County Board of Supervisors, John Moorlach, in his official and individual capacity, Collaborative Partners Esq., County of Orange Santa Ana and Wit Court Esq. in his official and individual capacity.

These individuals severed the United States Federal Code of Justice and to the emphasis of the foregoing U. S. Title(s) and to the flagrance of contemptuous mockeries, exercise no iota of recourse. In furtherance do understand these material facts concerning ill-begotten energy exchange-metamorphosis, understood as magic force(s of said to be Nature, that directly affected, to the extents of do cause casualties and death daily and do situate a have gun at court rancor in an effort to continue a treachery swindle the Health, Welfare(s), and Public Safety, of all who come to aid an abetment in these Criminal and Heinous acts against the Republic for which I stand?



TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 241
Prev Next
§ 241. Conspiracy against rights
How current is this?

If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured—

They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, they shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.


Wendy S. Lindley in her official and individual capacity(s), Orange County Probation Department, James R. Pinck in his, (ours),official and individual capacity, Alice Jones, in her official and individual capacity(s), Eden Martelly, in her official and individual capacity(s) , Orange County Sheriff Department, each individual to this sequester Affidavit of involvement, Sandra Hutchens in her official and individual capacity(s) Orange County Board of Supervisors, John Moorlach, in his official and individual capacity, Collaborative Partners Esq., County of Orange Santa Ana and Wit Court Esq. in his official and individual capacity.

These individuals severed the United States Federal Code of Justice and to the emphasis of the foregoing U. S. Title(s) and to the flagrance of contemptuous mockeries, exercise no iota of recourse. In furtherance do understand these material facts concerning ill-begotten energy exchange-metamorphosis, understood as magic force(s of said to be Nature, that directly affected, to the extents of do cause casualties and death daily and do situate a have gun at court rancor in an effort to continue a treachery swindle the Health, Welfare(s), and Public Safety, of all who come to aid an abetment in these Criminal and Heinous acts against the Republic for which I stand?


TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 13 > § 242
Prev Next
§ 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law
How current is this?

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

Wendy S. Lindley in her official and individual capacity(s), Orange County Probation Department, James R. Pinck in his, (ours),official and individual capacity, Alice Jones, in her official and individual capacity(s), Eden Martelly, in her official and individual capacity(s) , Orange County Sheriff Department, each individual to this sequester Affidavit of involvement, Sandra Hutchens in her official and individual capacity(s) Orange County Board of Supervisors, John Moorlach, in his official and individual capacity, Collaborative Partners Esq., County of Orange Santa Ana and Wit Court Esq. in his official and individual capacity.

These individuals severed the United States Federal Code of Justice and to the emphasis of the foregoing U. S. Title(s) and to the flagrance of contemptuous mockeries, exercise no iota of recourse. In furtherance do understand these material facts concerning ill-begotten energy exchange-metamorphosis, understood as magic force(s of said to be Nature, that directly affected, to the extents of do cause casualties and death daily and do situate a have gun at court rancor in an effort to continue a treachery swindle the Health, Welfare(s), and Public Safety, of all who come to aid an abetment in these Criminal and Heinous acts against the Republic for which I stand?


TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 19 > § 371
Prev Next
§ 371. Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States
How current is this?

If two or more persons conspire either to commit any offense against the United States, or to defraud the United States, or any agency thereof in any manner or for any purpose, and one or more of such persons do any act to effect the object of the conspiracy, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.
If, however, the offense, the commission of which is the object of the conspiracy, is a misdemeanor only, the punishment for such conspiracy shall not exceed the maximum punishment provided for such misdemeanor.


Wendy S. Lindley in her official and individual capacity(s), Orange County Probation Department, James R. Pinck in his, (ours),official and individual capacity, Alice Jones, in her official and individual capacity(s), Eden Martelly, in her official and individual capacity(s) , Orange County Sheriff Department, each individual to this sequester Affidavit of involvement, Sandra Hutchens in her official and individual capacity(s) Orange County Board of Supervisors, John Moorlach, in his official and individual capacity, Collaborative Partners Esq., County of Orange Santa Ana and Wit Court Esq. in his official and individual capacity.

These individuals severed the United States Federal Code of Justice and to the emphasis of the foregoing U. S. Title(s) and to the flagrance of contemptuous mockeries, exercise no iota of recourse. In furtherance do understand these material facts concerning ill-begotten energy exchange-metamorphosis, understood as magic force(s of said to be Nature, that directly affected, to the extents of do cause casualties and death daily and do situate a have gun at court rancor in an effort to continue a treachery swindle the Health, Welfare(s), and Public Safety, of all who come to aid an abetment in these Criminal and Heinous acts against the Republic for which I stand?



TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 19 > § 373
Prev Next
§ 373. Solicitation to commit a crime of violence
How current is this?

(a) Whoever, with intent that another person engage in conduct constituting a felony that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against property or against the person of another in violation of the laws of the United States, and under circumstances strongly corroborative of that intent, solicits, commands, induces, or otherwise endeavors to persuade such other person to engage in such conduct, shall be imprisoned not more than one-half the maximum term of imprisonment or (notwithstanding section 3571) fined not more than one-half of the maximum fine prescribed for the punishment of the crime solicited, or both; or if the crime solicited is punishable by life imprisonment or death, shall be imprisoned for not more than twenty years.

(b) It is an affirmative defense to a prosecution under this section that, under circumstances manifesting a voluntary and complete renunciation of his criminal intent, the defendant prevented the commission of the crime solicited. A renunciation is not “voluntary and complete” if it is motivated in whole or in part by a decision to postpone the commission of the crime until another time or to substitute another victim or another but similar objective. If the defendant raises the affirmative defense at trial, the defendant has the burden of proving the defense by a preponderance of the evidence.

(c) It is not a defense to a prosecution under this section that the person solicited could not be convicted of the crime because he lacked the state of mind required for its commission, because he was incompetent or irresponsible, or because he is immune from prosecution or is not subject to prosecution.


Wendy S. Lindley in her official and individual capacity(s), Orange County Probation Department, James R. Pinck in his, (ours),official and individual capacity, Alice Jones, in her official and individual capacity(s), Eden Martelly, in her official and individual capacity(s) , Orange County Sheriff Department, each individual to this sequester Affidavit of involvement, Sandra Hutchens in her official and individual capacity(s) Orange County Board of Supervisors, John Moorlach, in his official and individual capacity, Collaborative Partners Esq., County of Orange Santa Ana and Wit Court Esq. in his official and individual capacity.

These individuals severed the United States Federal Code of Justice and to the emphasis of the foregoing U. S. Title(s) and to the flagrance of contemptuous mockeries, exercise no iota of recourse. In furtherance do understand these material facts concerning ill-begotten energy exchange-metamorphosis, understood as magic force(s of said to be Nature, that directly affected, to the extents of do cause casualties and death daily and do situate a have gun at court rancor in an effort to continue a treachery swindle the Health, Welfare(s), and Public Safety, of all who come to aid an abetment in these Criminal and Heinous acts against the Republic for which I stand?




TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 47 > § 1001
Prev Next
§ 1001. Statements or entries generally
How current is this?

(a) Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—

(1) falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;

(2) makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or

(3) makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;

shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.

(b) Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.

(c) With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1) administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or

(2) any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate

Wendy S. Lindley in her official and individual capacity(s), Orange County Probation Department, James R. Pinck in his, (ours),official and individual capacity, Alice Jones, in her official and individual capacity(s), Eden Martelly, in her official and individual capacity(s) , Orange County Sheriff Department, each individual to this sequester Affidavit of involvement, Sandra Hutchens in her official and individual capacity(s) Orange County Board of Supervisors, John Moorlach, in his official and individual capacity, Collaborative Partners Esq., County of Orange Santa Ana and Wit Court Esq. in his official and individual capacity.

These individuals severed the United States Federal Code of Justice and to the emphasis of the foregoing U. S. Title(s) and to the flagrance of contemptuous mockeries, exercise no iota of recourse. In furtherance do understand these material facts concerning ill-begotten energy exchange-metamorphosis, understood as magic force(s of said to be Nature, that directly affected, to the extents of do cause casualties and death daily and do situate a have gun at court rancor in an effort to continue a treachery swindle the Health, Welfare(s), and Public Safety, of all who come to aid an abetment in these Criminal and Heinous acts against the Republic for which I stand?



THE NATURE OF THIS LEGAL ACTION(S) IS SUCH:
IF IN ITS OWN RIGHT(S) AN UNDER SIGNATORY DO FIND: THE COURT(S), AS TO IMPLY:


IN LIEU OF THE WITNESS THE PARTIES HERE TO DO WITH EVERY AND ANY PRE-MEDITATED CRIMINAL ACT(S), OR TRESPASS, SUCH AS MURDER, KIDNAP, RAPE, ARSON, ARMED ROBBERY(S), 911 TWIN TOWER-LIKE ACTS OF SAID WAR AND OR TREACHERY, TERRORISM, FELONIOUS FRAUD SOWARDS AGAINST A CITIZEN, VISITOR, OR PRINCIPAL WHO SO IN SAYING GUARANTEED PROTECTION UNDER THE LAW(S), MAY RECOVER AND OR HOLD ACCOUNTABLE, AN LIABLE COMPENSATION HERESO THE UNDERSTATES A SAID POLICE DEPARTMENT OR ANCILLARY OF THE PRINCIPALITY HAVING JURISDICTION AND SAY AT A PARTICULAR COMPLAINT(S) THEREOF.








COUNTS for Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1962(d) Prohibited activities. COUNTS for Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1506 Theft or alteration of record or process;
COUNTS for Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy. COUNTS for Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 242 Deprivation of rights under color.
COUNTS for Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341 Frauds and swindles as defined by Title 18 U.S.C. § 1346. Definition of “scheme or artifice to defraud,

COUNTS for Violation of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1341 Frauds and swindles. COUNTS for Violation of Title: 28 USC Rule 79 and CLERKS MANUAL, Chapter 15, § 15.03 COUNTS for Violation of District Court Clerks Manual, Chapter 20, § 20.01 Attorney Admissions Procedures. COUNTS for Violation of Title 18 USC § 1920 COUNTS for Violation of Title 18 USC § 1001CLERKS MANUAL, Chapter 1, Exh. 2, Title 18 USC § 1001 COUNTS for Violation of Title 28 USC F.R.C.P. Rule 26. General Provisions Governing Discovery; Duty of Disclosure as amended 2000 All individuals named here at in above entitled actions read his notice of intent to use a said act of Nature and / or Nature’s God,

COUNTS for Violation of CLERKS MANUAL, Chapter 9, Exhibit 4

4. FIRST AMENDED CIVIL RICO CLAIM EDCV

Defendants


FIRST AMENDED CIVIL RICO CLAIM FOR DAMAGES AND OTHER RELIEF FOR VIOLATION OF THE FALSE CLAIMS ACT PERJURED THEIR POSITION IN ORDER TO BENEFIT DECEPTIVE PRACTICES OF DE-EVOLUTE MURDER MAGIC; MEANING:

(a) AIDING AN ABETMENT IN THE ACTS of MASS MURDER-S, ORGANIZED CELLULAR TERRORISM, DID AND STILL INTENDING TO KILL, MAME, DEFRAUD, ABUSE PRIVILEGES AND AUTHORITY, TO THE DAY OF INFAMY HERE SITUATED AND THROUGHOUT HISTORY?S CLAIM OF NEVER A FACE OF EVOLUTION REGRESSION WITH A SUPERIOR KNOWLEDGE TO SERVE A DISTRICT AND ATTORNEY GENERALS QUARTER AS CLAIRVOYANT NUCLEAR AND FIREPROOF FALSE CLOAK SWEARING TREASON AGAINST ALL TO THE FLAGRENCE OF THE HOUR OF THIS IMPUTE I SAY? DONE AND DATED 08 JUNE 2010-CE. 09. AM PST.



THE PARTICULAR CHARGES ARE BEING THWARTED AND RIDICULED BY ALL WHO COME TO DENY THE HUMAN EMBRYO IS OUT-NUMBERED BY FORENSIC AN UNDERHANDED CANDOR AS ALL DEPUTIES IN QUESTIONING A SEARCH HEREAS I SEE IN AND AT EACH INDIVIDUAL DULY SWORN TO UPHOLD DO SEVERE U S CODE OF APPLICABLE LAW.

A JUDGE, AND A COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP(S) ESQ. ON DUTY TODAY DO FALSIFY THE TELEPATHIC STATUS IRONY IN AN SEDITIOUS ACT(S) OF TREASON IN SERVICE FOR AN HAVE GUNS AND INFAMY AND SAID FIRE AND NUCLEAR PSYCHIC CO-CRIMEE ADVANTAGES TO SUCCOR A FAULTY IMPRESSION AT?

CLAIMANT ATTESTS THE COURT(S) IN QUESTION(S); WILLFULLY ORDERS AN INJUNCTION TO CEASE AND DESIST PROTESTING AGAINST OFFICIAL(S) CAPACITY TO USE SAID ILL-BEGOTTEN EXTRA-SENSORY, (ESP) MAGIC 911 CO-CRIMEE ABUSES AND IN SO DOING DENY THE CLAIMANT HIS CIVIL LIBERTIES?

THE COUNTY'S HERETO THESE OFFICIAL PRACTICES OF HAVE GUN AND INTIMIDATION TO PREY UPON A WITNESS I SEE HEREAT A FAULTY CONSTRAINT(S) (PAST), IS FAULTY IMPRESSION BRINGING TO THE PHONE NUMBER I HAVE UP AT NUCLEAR AND FIREPROOF ESP CO-CRIMEE ABUSE AND EMPHASIS.



THE STATED SAID INFRARED SURVEILLANCE ON MAP TOPOGRAPHY TO THE EMPHASIS OF GLOBAL TELEPATHY GIVE CANDOR TO SUGGEST(S) THE ALTERED STATES LIKE ABILITIES TO CONVERSE EXTRA-TELEPATHICALLY IS SO TO OUR ATTENTION DESPITE A MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS FAULTY CONSTRAIN-TED IDIOM TO SEARCH?

THE SAID ACCUSED IN THESE LEGAL PRETENSE DO ASCRIBE A DIFFERENT IMPRESSION IN AN ACT(S) OF AN ABETMENT IN DISCRIMINATORY PLEADINGS COME TO BE ATTESTING IN THIS LETTERS OF PRECIPITOUS COMMON GROUNDS AS: CRIMINAL COURT(S) RACKETEERING IN MURDEROUS INFLUENCED CORRUPT AND ORGANIZED HEINOUS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY (RICO), IN DISREGARD(S) AND CONTEMPT FOR RELATIVE JUDICIAL, STATE-S AND FEDERAL LAWS THAT ARE INTENDED TO PROTECT AND SERVE THE QUESTION(S) OF LAWFUL EVENTUALITY?

5. This is a first amended action brought by plaintiff STEVEN VAN ARROYO, who petitions for redress of grievances, and requests that the court hold defendants accountable for violations of Title 18 U.S.C. § 1962 et seq. (West 2001), clearly established law, other applicable federal statutes, and applicable state statutes, for fraud and swindle, for obstruction of justice, conspiring to obstruct justice for themselves and others for operating the courts as a racketeering enterprise, for the filing of false claims , perjury, crimes against humanity, perfidy and for obstructing justice on a qui tam..


DEMAND FOR COMPENSATION BY A PLAINTIFF AGAIN


6. HAVING PERSONALLY WAIVED AN UNDERSTANDING OF METAMORPHOSIS LIKE ENERGY EXCHANGE AT THE LEVELS OF UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT AND EARTHLY ELECTED OFFICIAL LEADERS, WE THE PROVIDENTIAL FORCE ARE ENGAGED IN A TEST?

A CONSCIENTIOUS VICTIM WHO DO UNDENIABLY TOOK UMBRAGE TO OUR THE FINDING OF OUR SUPERIOR CLARAVOYANCE, THE UNLAWFUL AND REPREHENSIBLE PRACTICE OF DREADED BEAST 6 LIKENESS REGRESSION CIRCUS DE-EVOLUTE ALIEN DOUBLE SIDED LIVES TO CANDOR A SAID RIGHT FOR SAID HUMAN LIKE AN PLAINTIFF DESCRIBED?

PLAINTIFF I SEAT SAW THE DUAL DIAGNOSIS ACTIONS OF A FAULTY CONSTRAINT CIRCUS.

CONTESTING IN AN EFFORT TO RECOGNIZE A U S PLEDGE AND OBLIGATION IN AN INTEREST OF UPHOLD LIFE; MEANS EVOLVE FURTHER IN VIEW OF A UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT TREACHERY AND SWINDLE CANDOR BY LOCAL GOVERNING RISK ASSIGNMENT EMPLOYED ALL OR NOT WAGE RY?S?
IN THE INTEREST OF PUBLIC SAFETY AND IN AN EFFORT TO DETER MORE MURDER MAGIC ACCUMULATION ENERGY EXCHANGE TAKE-OVERS, A PLAINTIFF SEEKS A JUDGMENT IN ADVANCE OF SAID DANGERS AND COMPLEXITIES A MUTANT AND REGRESSIVE IRONY WOULD PREDICATE.

PAGES UNDER CONSTRUCTION 06 JUNE 2010?

10. AN EVIL IS AN OPINION AT A COURT SIDE. SHE WENDY LINDLEY AND ALL JUDGES PER SAY, I HEAR, SEE, AND ATTESTS NOT AN INTEREST OF ALL TO DO WITH NUCLEAR AND FIREPROOF, DREADED ANIMALS OF PREY METAMORPHOSIS REFERRED TO AS MAGICIAN PEOPLES ?AN ALIEN-LIKE ENERGY EXCHANGE BEGOTTEN FROM RAPING AND KILLING USUALLY AND PASSED THROUGH INHERITANCE AS WELL DO AND DOES POSE A THREAT TO THE HEALTH AND PUBLIC SAFETY TO THOSE WHO COME ENDOWED WITH MORAL AND LEGAL CHARACTERISTIC S CLOAK SWEARERS LYING AWAY?

13. U S INSTITUTION CIRCUMNAVIGATES STILL AN UNLADEN QUANTITY?S OF EXPLOSIVE FISSILE MATERIAL AND IS AVERAGES THREE TO FORTY TIMES MORE ANATOMICALLY IN ACCURATE OF IT?S COUNTS AND IS IN DIRECT VIOLATION OF START II WHICH THIS AND PAST ADMINISTRATIVE CLINICIANS.



23-39 OMITTED

39. Plaintiff demands that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 1, Scope and Purpose of Rules, shall govern this action, and plaintiff shall preserve, inviolate, his right of trial by interpretation of the clauses I attest under Rule 38, and right of discovery disclosures without request prescribed under Rule 26, concurrent with defendant's Answers and allegations of the entire Senate and Supreme Courts D C are in contempt understood to all I say Catholic service bias Anti?-christ response, when in the course of Human event?s the ventriloquist, a said act of Nature and Natures God (s), from thence come to show his face(s) to be understood in all manner of tongue etiquette the material facts as states nuclear proof and psychic 911 co-crimee cloak and police individuals are in fact a legal precedents to decide a matter of public record?
Im pursuant to Rule 7(a) and Rule 8(b), with no other pleadings allowed except upon Order of the Court under grounds provided by law.

40. NOTICE'S OF A FORCES OF NATURE IN OUR OBJECTIVES SERVICE APPLICATION AFFIDAVITS:

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

41. Shall: re-decide all issues including immunity, and upon all claims in this suit if the proper settlement wasn't opted fire sided.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE

42. Mostly all procedures, rules and codes are taken from West?s 2001 editions of Federal Civil Judicial Procedures and Rules, and Federal Criminal Code and Rules, hereinafter referred to by Title number, U.S.C. (United States Code), and § (section).

43. An International World Court of Justices has no say because all are degenerates emphasize it better. A U N and Senator I elected now presiding has a say in as though it's his jurisdiction over this action and decrees pursuant to federal statutes, including Title 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question), Title 28 U.S.C. § 1343 (civil rights and elective franchise), Title 28 U.S.C. § 1355 (federal fines, penalties and forfeitures), Title 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 and 3730 et esq. (false claims), Title 18 U.S.C. §§ 2, 3, 4, 43, 201, 241, 242, 891, 1001, 1341, 1505, 1506, 1719, 1920, 1962 (principals, accessories, obstruction of justice, racketeering, fraud, treason against a United States, embezzlement, perjury, mayhem in some degrees, fraudulent or false entries, mail fraud, violation,, alteration or destruction of federal records, fraud, terrorism, conspiracy against civil rights, deprivation of civil rights under color, genocide), Title 15 U.S.C. §§ 1-7.

44. First Amendment (right to petition for redress of grievances), Seventh Amendment (right to trial by sequestration redress of impropriety?s; ad libed &), Fourteenth Amendment, (right to equal protection), and the USA PATRIOT Act (domestic terrorism).

45. Venue, (Emergency Management Predicate Acts of Attrition), is proper under Title 28 U.S.C. § 84.

46. The United States is comprised of the federal government, and has sovereign standing to sue or be sued. Head offices for all branches of the federal government are located in Washington, DC, with branch offices/agencies in all states, which are created under 28 U.S.C. § 124. State and private agencies contract with cities and/or counties, are directly or indirectly regulated by the federal government, and are subject to liability pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 666.
OPPOSITION TO MAGISTRATE, 28 U.S.C. sections 636(c)

47. Plaintiff hereby files this his OPPOSITION TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE?S unlawful JURISDICTION, 28 U.S.C. section 636, to prevent magistrate, first mental psych Judges of record 1992 KNEW HE DONE AN EVIL A LIED A FAITH TO THE DETENTION FORCES I OBEYED ALL THAT; NOW, BY a ladder falsifications Judge Ted Mallard Westminster Judging and David Stotler Superior Court Santa Ana perjured the court I submits, assigned by a Clerk on or around 1997 / 1999, 2008-9 Wendy S. Lindley and Federal Prosecutors knowingly perjure a fool all side to the emphasis here instating, to wage warfare, death, demise of every cantankerous descriptive a war veteran metamorphic can deny add adage our stipulating said ?return of the form to the Clerk? which provides the following notes:

48. "RETURN THIS FORM TO THE CLERK OF THE COURT ONLY IF ALL PARTIES HAVE CONSENTED ON THIS FORM TO THE EXERCISE OF JURISDICTION BY A UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE". The magistrate judge and the CLERK now in not, or reasonable assisting-s should have known, that an Act of Nature and Natures God a Cartographic Cartoon-like telepathy, with demonstrable characters of precognitive magma eruptive and other qualities may be probable cause to suggest more appropriate and quality attention with a view to public safety be given this event there stated?

Victim(s) alleges violation of plaintiff?s rights secured by law, 18 U.S.C. sections 241 and 242, and Article III of the Constitution for the United States and presents a claim cognizable under 42 U.S.C. section 1983 and conspiracy under section 1985(3). Defendants Dr. Gary Delewski ,Dr. Glen Richmond, Dr. Pham, Dr. Chong Orange County Mental Health, County of Orange, State of said California, Defendants, do so lie in wait, this and in still racket in murder influence corrupt organized crime,(rico), conspiracy to dunder never, did ?have a meeting of the minds? to conspire with co-conspirators after notice of their conduct and behavior to obstruct these proceedings in furtherance of their said joint racketeering schemes or artifice as alleged in complaint, in direct or indirect conflict with statutory law subsequent to the decisions in., 186 F. 3d 1105 (9th Cir. 1999); also. 193 F.3d 1080 (9th Cir. 1999).

PLAINTIFF?S DEMAND FOR FULL DISCLOSURE PER TITLE 28 U.S.C. RULE 26

49. Plaintiff demands that all defendants fully disclose the following without delay,
obstruction or denial of the states ?emphasis? to the letter of prescriptions impursuant:
Copy of their Oaths of Office
Copy of their Bond
Copy of their Insurance
Copy of their state licenses
Copies of appearance bonds on each case
Copy of a list of all their creditors
Copy of a list of all their debtors
Memberships of all clubs, organizations, fraternities, groups
Treaties per limitations of the Constitution(s?),
Names, addresses and phone numbers of all witnesses for their defense
Names, addresses and phone numbers of any other entities pertinent to this case
Copies of any other papers pertinent to this case
NOTICE AND DEMAND FOR NON-NEGOTIABLE, CONTRACT WITH THE COURT AS WITH EACH DEFENDANT, FOR NOTICE TO RETAIN A PRESIDING SAFETY MECHANISM?

50. Plaintiff gives notice and demands that since titles of nobility were abolished by Article 1, section 9 of the United States Constitution, each defendant is required to answer Summons individually and separately without an attorney/esquire. Plaintiff demands no third parties on this case, no third-party answers, and each line answered by each defendant.
PARTIES, F.R.C.P. RULE 17:

51. Plaintiff STEVEN VAN ARROYO (?Plaintiff?) is a citizen of the United States residing within the State of California at 15432 Jackson St. #302 Midway City CA. THE COUNTY OF ORANGE 92655.

52. The UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is hereby sued in its corporate capacity
doing business from c/o AL GONZALES / JOHN ASHCROFT, ERIK HOLDER, 10th & Constitution Avenues, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20530.

53. AL GONZALES AND JOHN ASHCROFT are hereby sued in their official and individual capacity doing business from 950 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Washington, D.C. 20530.

54. The ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE U.S. COURTS (?OFFICE?) is
hereby sued in its official capacity doing business from 1 Columbus Circle, Washington, D.C. 20544. OFFICE directs training both at the Federal Judicial Center In-Court Programs Branch, One Columbus Circle N.E., Washington, D.C. 20002, and at other in-house training programs nation-wide in each of the 92 United States district courthouses.




55. LEONIDAS RALPH MECHAM (“MECHAM”) is hereby sued in his official and
individual capacity doing business from 1 Columbus Circle, Washington, D.C. 20544.

56. DAVID J. MALAND is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from 101 Pecan St., Room 112, Sherman, Texas 75090

57. WILLIAM G. PUTNICKI is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity
doing business from 655 East Durango Blvd., San Antonio, Texas 78206

58. SHERYL L. LOESCH is hereby sued in her official and individual capacity doing
business from Office of the Clerk, United States Courthouse, Tampa, Florida 33602.

59. SHERRI R. CARTER is hereby sued in her official and individual capacity doing
business from 312 N. Spring St., No. G-8, Los Angeles, California 90012-4793.

60. JACK WAGNER is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from 501 “I” Street, Sacramento, CA 95814.

61. RACHEL INGRAM is hereby sued in her official and individual capacity doing
business from 3470 12th St., Riverside, CA 92501.

62. Defendants DAVID J. MALAND, WILLIAM G. PUTNICKI, SHERRI R.
CARTER, SHERYL L. LOESCH, and JACK WAGNER supervise, direct, and train all clerks in their districts including RACHEL INGRAM, and they, along with their deputy clerks and other court staff are herein collectively known and addressed as “CLERKS.”

63. ROBERT D. McCALLUM is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity
doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044.

64. MICHAEL F. HERTZ is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044.

65. STEVE D. ALTMAN is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044.

66. ANDREW SKOWRONEK is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity
doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044.

67. JOHN S. GORDON is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7516, Los
Angeles, CA 90012

68. LEON W. WEIDMAN is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7516, Los
Angeles, CA 90012.

69. GARY PLESSMAN is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7516, Los
Angeles, CA 90012.

70. KRISTINE BLACKWOOD is hereby sued in her official and individual capacity
doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7516, Los Angeles, CA 90012.

72. 2006 U S Attorney’s Offices Sacramento CA. 95814 in concise.

73. KIRSTEN SUDHOFF DOOR is hereby sued in her official and individual
capacity, doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 501 “I” Street, Ste. 10-100,
Sacramento, CA 95814.

74. 2006 U S Attorney’s New York City District of Manhattan 10017 adjust it

75. 1998 U S Attorney’s presented with 12 year moratorium dictatorships U N S C.

76. PAUL MICHAEL BROWN is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity,
doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 7146, Washington, D.C. 20044.

77. LEON W. WEIDMAN is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity,
doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 N. Los Angeles St., Room 7516, Los
Angeles, CA 90012.

78. Bill LOCKYER U S Attorney’s Offices Sacramento CA. 95814.

79. ROBERT D. McCALLUM is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity
doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station, Washington,
D.C. 20044.

80. MICHAEL F. HERTZ is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044.

81. STEVE D. ALTMAN is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044.

82. ANDREW SKOWRONEK is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity
doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, P.O. Box 261, Ben Franklin Station, Washington, D.C. 20044.

83. JOHN S. GORDON is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7516, Los
Angeles, CA 90012

84. LEON W. WEIDMAN is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7516, Los
Angeles, CA 90012.

85. GARY PLESSMAN is hereby sued in his official and individual capacity doing
business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7516, Los
Angeles, CA 90012.

86. KRISTINE BLACKWOOD is hereby sued in her official and individual capacity
doing business from c/o U.S. Attorney’s Office, 300 North Los Angeles Street, Room 7516, Los Angeles, CA 90012.

87. Defendants MICHAEL CARONA, GREY DAVIS, ARNOLD SCHWARZNEGGER, EDMOND BROWN, DONNA SHALLALA, PETER PACE, NAVAL DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS, NCIS AND THEIR AGENCY’S AFFILIATE’(S), AGENT MOSS, MICHEAL MULLEN, ROBERT MUELLER, ABC NEWS OWNER, NBC, CBS, CNN, UN NEWS, UPI, AP, WILLIAM GATES, WILLIAM COHEN, WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON, CONTY OF LOS ANGELES LA SUPERIOR AND APPELATE DIVISION(S), DR. DELEWSKI, PHAM. LYN BURKE, GAIL LOVELACE DR. GLENN RICHMOND H B HOSPICES AND LISCENSED CLINICIAN, DR. CHONG,

WIT COURT AND STAFF, A COLLABORATIVE IN OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY, ORANGE COUNY PROBATION, JOHN HAMBUCH, STEVEN HORN, STEVE HOWIESON, RON LOWENBERG MIKE SELLARS, JOHN DUGAN, CLEIDE RENKE,, HUNTINGTON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL,, WESTERN MEDICAL GROUP, ROYALE ETC, DANA ROHRABACHER, DIANNE FEINSTEIN, BARBARA BOXER,,JOHN WHITE, DR. GARY DELEWKI, DR. GLEN RICHMOND, A UNITED STATES SENATE AND A US CONGRESS,

UNITED STATE NAVY, THE COUNTY'S OF ORANGE AND LOS ANGELES IN OUR OFFICIAL AND INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY'S, L A COUNTY ARCH DIOCESE, A UNITED WAY OF ORANGE COUNTY CA., GIL COERPER, KENNETH SMALL RONALD LOWENBERG, DANA ROHRABACHER; are all sued in their official and individual, capacity here from our witness in spite of the perjury outfits, did see and undertake either a metamorphosis energy exchange in an effort to de-gress, empower, kill and caused:

HEINOUS CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY SUCH AS HIATI EARTHQUAKE AND JAPAN TSUNAMI, WILFULL ABUSE OF EXTRA-SENSORY PYSCHIATRY IN AN DERELICTION AND DIS-REGARD-S TO THE EMPHASIS OF ONENESS WITH THE GEOLOGICAL AND EARTHEN MAGMA RELATING CASUALTIES IN THEIR DECEPTIVE PRIVILIGE ABUSE THIS AT FEM(A) FUNDS AND PRIVILIGED RESPONSIBILITIES HERETO.


88. In furtherance for the purpose set out in the preceding Sub-para-graphical:

BROWN, LEON W. WEIDMAN, PATRICIA A. WILLING, ROBERT D. McCALLUM, MICHAEL F. HERTZ, STEVE D. ALTMAN, ANDREW SKOWRONEK, JOHN S. GORDON, LEON W. WEIDMAN, GARY PLESSMAN, and KRISTINE BLACKWOOD,: ERIK HOLDER
are all present or former U.S. Attorneys, Assistant U.S. Attorneys or Deputy U.S. Attorneys, who are sworn to protect the Constitution from alien, domestic and foreign invasion(s), and are herein established for a purpose of protecting and serving the interests of public safety, collectively known as ?U.S. ATTORNEYS.?

The U S Attorney's willful and deliberately CO DEAL AS CO-CRIMEE 911 ACCOMLICEE RE-ITERATING ABUSE PSYCHIATRIC EXTRA-SENSORY ABILITY TO CO-KILL AND CO-TRAFFIC, IN TAR HEROIN MANUFACTURE, HOOK, VICTIMS.

THIS AND-S allows the illegal trespass of nearly unscrupulous fugitive like trespassers? across the sound reinforcement of LADY CLOAK SWEARERS PRETENTIOUS INTIMIDATION'S.


91. CERTIFICATION OF ADMISSIBILITY, RULE 801 308.
I, plaintiff Steven V. Arroyo inter alias Steven V. Schofer; DESBIC and Israeli Intelligences Officials, stand by plaintiff in the above entitled action, do swear under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America, that the foregoing is of my personal knowledge, being true and correct, and admissible against all defendants to establish the ?existence of a civil conspiracy to use the courts as a racketeering enterprise, to use the courts to establish and collect fraudulent detention debts and judgments, to obstruct justice in order to evade prosecution for trans genet-ical cross pollinating co-conspirators deed fraud murder and, swindle, to submit false claims, to deny qui tam relater?s reward, and to deny us the Union ambitions forwardly, the citizen

(s?) due process rights pursuant to the 1997 Amendment of Federal Rules of Evidence, Rule 801 et seq.

92. There then for enzyme surpluses to remove the doubtful irony I predicted you all will waste trillions of ingots on a anti?-Christ campaign when the stellar diplomacy issues regarding stellar advisement's to agree on dictatorship term limits to alleviate the option of a campaign of laughter over those precious words of fate all snide a lying effort to achieve this anticipated outcome to assault Babylon and kill again cages I go under I?m on.

94. The entire United States is older than I seat a Plaintiff prayed for the peace on earth through the Holy Trinity?s, God saves from the D-day anti?-Christ now ongoing in every sad we can all want and taunt a lie to what is never do or we could had a system to unearthed uranium ore and a radioactive accumulations they are too late for magic shows they will not vanish Pershing, SS 18-S for a fight instead areas of annoy not all is majority aided and abets foe fumbling therefore I won?t achieve a cosmic magic forces even though.. .

95. DONE 08 JUNE 2011 IN GOD'S WILL WE TRUST TO THESE ENDS SEEK A WISE INFORMANT?S SOLUTION TO THE DISTANCE BETWEEN SENSES FOR THE PURPOSE OF EXPERTIZE AND YOUTH OF OUR WAGES UNITY IN ALL; POSTED OUT OF FAITH AND FEAR IN GOD'S WILL WE TRUST; PETITIONERS PRAY FOR THE PEACE IN JERUSALEM AND GOODWILL TOWARD ONE AN-OTHERS INEBRIATION'S AND FORTITUDE, USE RESPONSIBLY SELAH

Sues as follows:

(a) Malicious confinement,

(b) medical mal practice,

(c) falsifying a medical report,

(d) falsifying a condition to punish the tax payers for un-necessary expenses such as prescriptions and incarceration fees,

(e) imposing psycho therapy as coercion and a satanic scheme; psych therapy fees. against Cal Optimas, MHA, Orange County Mental Health, all of the Physicians mentioned in Dr. Gary Delewski AND ALL THE ABOVE INFERENCES I d BADGES, GUNS,INCLUDING CHAPTER 46 OF THIS PROVISION MENTAL DEFENDANTS NAMED AND CITED who perjured themselves in order to profit set as a racketeering and high treason charge organ,.

(g) $165,000 per annually increments, 16 years lost pay equals 2.615 million dollars rates influenced by corridors vehement denials.

(h) for defaming my moral fortitude and character associated with making phone calls to bring this divine intervention to light and in doing so libeled my health and human behavior identity for when it was time to consider opting for a telepath station,

(i) for forcibly medicating us for years on in with Zyprexa, a recalled antidote on a Rico Claims civil suits nationwide and causing temporary insanity, blindness, and heart attack and cardiac arrest frequent that I still suffer from,

(j) for getting us dependent on the medications they prescribed, for when I opt to not dose at bedtimes, I cannot fall asleep and I go into a state of shock at sleeping hours and it almost kills us if we go several days without the said medications I am accustomed to, forensic evaluators.

96. A behavioral sciences professional is forced to not know what is right and proper in the sight of our Lord and peoples constituents and what is lewd or improper, heinous, homicidal, perjury, racketeering, influence peddling, scheme-atic, conspiring none the less, aiding an abetment in folly, lying and conspiring to anti?-equate the Divine Intervention by forging an alliance with the murderers unions and is legally bound to testify to a recollection of ours that where an act of God appears, not to be amused, confused or conspire in cover ups conspiracy pro I got not with your ending notices suchly invited onwardly..



111. DUE PROPER TO SUPERIOR COURTS FINDINGS:


COUNTY OF ORANGE AN INCREMENT AMOUNT OF NOT LESSER THAN 7.3 MILLION DOLLARS AWARDED PLAINTIFF

COUNTY(S) OF LOS ANGELES AN INCREMENT OF NOT LESSER THEN 7.3 MILLION DOLLARS AWARDED VICTIMS, PETITIONER, AND CLAIMANT(S).
THESE PRECEDENCES MAY NOT INCLUDE ATTORNEY FEES SUCHLY?

STEVEN VAN ARROYO INTER ALIAS

CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH $1,000,000. ONE MILLION DOLLARS EVEN
CITY OF WESTMINSTER $1,000,000. ONE MILLION DOLLARS EVEN
CITY OF BUENA PARK $125, 000, ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND
CITY OF SANTA ANA $125,000. ONE HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS ALONE

COUNTY OF ORANGE RISK MANAGEMENT AND COUNTY ATTORNEY?S OFFICES, SHERIFF?S OFFICERS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY?S AND THEIR ASSISTED ORANGE COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH
$2.500,000 Two Million five hundred thousand dollars deposited alike pertains to a County Government executable
UNITED STATES FEDERAL INCOME RESERVES IT OWES US IS THREE OR FOUR MILLION DOLLARS DUE PATRIOTIC DEFENSE OWES US A COUPLE OF DEALINGS TOO.

115. All awards exchanges are to be directly deposited to his earnings as tax exempted, any per diem incentive or bonuses such as luxury items for miracles if ever are to be off limits to federal income revenue collectors wanted and these outcome are to be agreed upon with a stipulation that this master a certificate now enjoins a distinctive privileged and freedom of diplomatic immunity from impending new launches a superior knowledge has to situate.

116. It remains to be situated by a land anonymous aggressors calibrations who?d rather side Hell fires to freeze us not knowing what will do all up is soap on go. A Plaintiff may be due patriotic, be there will it diligently be received at any banking center to my address in formal check verification notices or wired to Plaintiff's account: . Bank of America Springdale and Edinger Branch, Huntington Beach Ca. 714 760 7046: Routing number: 122000661 Account Number XXXXX XXXXX c/o Steven Van Arroyo

117.
THE ASSURANCE AND INSURANCE PLEDGES OF ALL INSIGNIAS TO AN EMBLEM INCLUDING THE DEPOSITARY UNITED NATIONS ARE DELIVERED TO US OUR FATHERS STIPULATED NOT TO FEAR.




The cartographical Images of the 2nd coming of our Lord may be viewed under normal lighting. Seated not as contorting features on the topography of this exhibit (ii) entitled court room evidence

No comments: